Is Morocco has exceeded after a new constitution and early elections as well as the arrival of the center of the turmoil that Islamists know the area?
Morocco has not yet fully extend past the focus as long as the economic crisis can be a source of new tensions. We do not know what will occur if economic conditions become more difficult for Moroccans. However freedoms to point out that the property had knew how to move in a way early in order to accept constitutional reform a few days after the outbreak of demonstrations twentieth of February movement, while ignoring the demands of reform brought by political and associative currents since more than ten years. This reflects the flexibility of the Moroccan regime and its operation. Instead of allowing open debate on radical reform of the Moroccan political system, King succeeded in guiding the debate towards constitutional reform.
What Tqsdonh talking about radical reform of the political system?
NJP always on the fundamental question of its content: Is all of the property and store Kianyen different or they are not the only body itself? Is it possible to say that the property is able to dismantle the store? A fundamental question and dangerous. Has inherited it with the passage of time state two faces: traditional ownership on the one hand, and modern state on the other hand. Traditional state is stored.
Economic and administrative mafia that hinder the democratic process linked to the authority of the king. There store economic, political, and religious .. etc.. It is difficult today to separate entities but it is not impossible. Monarchy could break the store if the latter proceeded to represent the threat to stability in the country and the continuity of the monarchy.
How do you explain also the province of Morocco, despite everything on some political stability and continuity of the institutions?
To agree on the issue, which is that if we lived those events in the reign of Hassan II lived without doubt scenarios similar to what happened in neighboring countries, Tunisia and Egypt. But that happened ten years after the arrival of Mohammed VI to power, who established himself throughout this period single Kaarab of change. He also broke several taboos of the reign of Hassan II. In particular, here referred to the autonomy proposal, and the reform of the Code, and the recognition of Amazigh identity, and file management Years of Lead, and constitutional reform, etc. .. I do not say that these files have been resolved, but opened. As a result of this work, called the majority of the Maghreb gradual reform not a radical reform.
Then there is an important element that should be taken into account is that the political forces and community groups in Morocco completely divided, and almost all agree on the fact that property alone alternative to fundamentalism. It does not exist for political power could be a locomotive for change.
Is the AKP from?
Can not the Justice and Development Party to be a locomotive for the democratization and modernization of the country. Can be judged, and that is considered a major political force but he could not succeed a democratic transition. Islamists have shown in the recent conference of the Justice and Development Party took them to the apparent meaning of democracy and their rejection of the essence. They seem, in fact Mokhtzlen of democracy and modernity in the new resort to the technologies. But what is the benefit if they are invested for democratic values? Here recall the positions of the Justice and Development of equality and freedoms.
Justice reform and the fight against corruption contributes parallel in the democratization of the country ..
Yes, and I do not deny that there is a democratic aspect in the work of the Justice and Development Party. Particularly with regard to the area of the fight against corruption and equal opportunities. But the issue is also very important freedoms. They determine the nature of human relationships within a community. And those freedoms encircled Islamists tradition group تخال itself locked. Which contradicts the perception Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The freedom of the individual does not stop only when the freedom of the other. And respect for others is precisely what rejected قياديو justice and development. Then there is the eternal problem manifested in the exploitation of religion in politics. They do this in a way that implied. The current game of luck gravity. The Justice and Development Party is on the establishment of a network associative possible to work on the financing of state funds.
At the rear, is more something Azaajkm in the Justice and Development Party?
Is their quest for a religious state. I held no difference between the Salafists or moderates. Because they have the same goal in the long run. Justice and Development Fiqiadio never declare they are against Sharia. And content themselves by saying it is not a priority, and that go into them useless at the moment. The logic requires that the Islamic not Basalama if was not a factor for the application of Sharia and the establishment of a religious state.
But in the end, is not the Justice and Development Party image-dominated society refuses to freedom and equality, in the resort to sectarian?
Has been re-Moroccan society to the fold "traditional" and those fruit policy developed by the system since 1972, when the property decided exploitation of religion in politics in order to address the left basal or reformist, and through the spread of Wahhabism in Morocco. And here say that if society is not well it should develop a new policy for particular framework and change the mentality of backwardness following. Otherwise there would never be equality and equal, no freedom. On the other hand, I do not think the Justice and Development Party, presenting a picture of Moroccan society, most Moroccans those with moderate condemns popular and does not represent a threat to democracy which moreover gradually accept universal values. And here give you an example: a few years ago, some conservatives refuse to send their daughters to school only to discover later that they were wrong and change their habit without loss of devotion. Minority fundamentalists compared with Muslims and folk art. And here recall a witness jokes transmitted on the community about "Alkhuangah", a satirical way portray the phenomenon of new and exotic.
But Strecha property cord of Islamists in all this?
Islamists have understood long ago that the path of violence and confrontation should be left, and so many years ago, and therefore they are trying to persuade that they are not dangerous and that they can be brought garrison force Macleh traditional emirate of the faithful. We find the ownership of two faces: apparently there ownership of traditional and religious, adapted well and Islamists. But we find second hand modern ownership generally associated with foreign partners through economic and political relations based on the country's commitment to modernity and human rights. Accordingly, the property establish some balance note each time that it imposes itself, and they are the ones that move from behind the scenes.
Hit the debate over individual liberties strongest in society, but would you be sexual freedom and Breakfast Ramadan Mdkhalaha Alomthleen?
No, they're not Palmdkhlin Alomthleen but it is essential to let people speak. Because they have the right to manifest their views and principles and to express them. It essential manifestation of democracy. If the society and the public authorities refusing because reflect the following minority opinion, that means we are far from the democratic process. These demands may be unimportant or that they were not a priority, but it is important to let them cross, and people today believe that religion system imposed on everyone, single lifestyle and one explanation for all phenomena surrounding us.
Debate over individual liberties remind everyone that religion is a personal choice. And respect for others and different lifestyle represent ground for a democratic society. Islamists answer always "the right of the group." A right exists only in the religious states that adopt the idea of a "nation", and progress as a homogeneous group. To employ the voice of the majority in order to give homogeneity recipe to society. While we are different. And democracy remain the best way to manage our differences.
Do you change the Amazigh as an official language in concrete in the lives of Moroccans?
When there crisis Hoiatih, it freezes the country's development and threatens stability. Was beginning to feel satisfied today, and here give you an example: When we met Leaders reject Amazigh names to our children, it means that we do not exist or that we are second-class citizens. A serious sense. Recognition of Tamazight involvement of the Department of Moroccans in the development project. These people were excluded because they did not understand what was happening around them.
Is it enough
0 comments:
Post a Comment